Zambian 2013 Budget Reviewed by Kampamba Shula

On 12 October 2012, the Minister of Finance, Hon. Alexander Bwalya Chikwanda, MP, announced the 2013 National Budget. Budget highlights and taxation and other changes as contained in the Budget speech and the Zambia Revenue Authority (“ZRA”) publication.

INDECO (IDC): Past Problems and Opportunities Analysed by Kampamba Shula

INDECO (IDC): Past Problems and Opportunities Analysed

Critical Review of IMF 2013 Zambia ARTICLE IV CONSULTATION report by Kampamba Shula

Debt management is still on track The agreed norm is that for internal borrowing the threshold is 25 per cent of GDP but our debt stands at K17 billion, which is 15 per cent of GDP and for external borrowing, the threshold is 40 per cent and our debt is US$3.1 billion which is 14 per cent of GDP, so we are far below the agreed norms. So even in the long term , Zambia is still on track.

US Economy 2014 First Quarter Analysis and Outlook by Kampamba Shula

New data shows the U.S. economy contracted in the first quarter of this year, keeping pace with shifting expectations but down sharply from the prior already disappointing estimate.

Zambia Debt Analysis

Some might say that Zambia should not borrow externally and even as sincere as they may be they are wrong. When the Government borrows locally “Crowing out” happens.

Friday, June 20, 2014

Eurozone Q1, Q2 Outlook by Kampamba Shula

Eurozone Outlook

In the Euro Area, Q1 GDP growth readings were mixed: two of the five largest countries (Germany and Spain) strongly expanded while France stagnated and Italy contracted, capping the Euro Area growth to an unchanged 0.8 percent (q/q saar). April PMI data here suggests that industrial activity was expanding strongly (at 54.1), while industrial production data suggests easing momentum, slowing to 0.8 percent (3m/3m saar) in March from 1.7 percent in February. Meanwhile, the ECB committed to a stimulus package to bolster economic recovery and bring inflation back on target (World Bank, 2014).

Seasonally adjusted GDP rose by 0.2% in the Eurozone (EA18) and by 0.3% in the EU28 during the first quarter of 2014, compared with the previous quarter, according to flash estimates published by Eurostat, the statistics office of the European Union. In the fourth quarter of 2013, GDP (gross domestic product) grew by 0.2% in the Eurozone and by 0.4% in the EU28 (Finfacts, 2014).
Compared with the same quarter of the previous year, seasonally adjusted GDP rose by 0.9% in the Eurozone  and by 1.4% in the EU28 in the first quarter of 2014, after +0.5% and +1.0% respectively in the previous quarter (Finfacts, 2014).

The UK and Germany grew by 0.8%, Spain expanded 0.4% and Italy contracted slightly at -0.1%. Portugal also reported a contraction at -0.7% while Finland is back in recession with two straight quarterly dips of 0.4% (Finfacts, 2014).
Germany

The German economy is gaining momentum. In the first quarter of 2014, the gross domestic product (GDP) rose 0.8% on the fourth quarter of 2013 after adjustment for price, seasonal and calendar variations. The moderate growth rate of last year (+0.4% in the last quarter of 2013) has given way to an accelerated expansion. Destatis, the federal statistics office, also reported, however, that a factor that contributed to the strong growth at the beginning of the year was the extremely mild weather.

In a quarter-on-quarter German comparison (adjusted for price, seasonal and calendar variations), positive contributions were made only by domestic demand, according to provisional calculations. Households and general government increased their final consumption expenditure at the beginning of the year. Capital formation showed a positive development, too. Fixed capital formation in construction and in machinery and equipment was markedly up on the fourth quarter of 2013, and building inventories also supported the GDP. Foreign trade, however, had a downward effect on economic growth. According to provisional calculations, exports of goods were down at the beginning of 2014, while imports of goods were markedly up on the last quarter of 2013 (Hennigan, 2014).

France

GDP growth was 0.0%, missing expectations for 0.1% growth.
In contrast with Germany, French consumers reduced spending and companies cut back on investment, data showed Thursday, signalling that the Eurozone recovery remains weak and vulnerable to setbacks.
The OECD this month cut its forecast for France to growth of 0.9% this year and 1.5% next, with only a “marginal” fall in unemployment expected by the end of 2015, similar to the European Commission's outlook.
Spain

Spanish GDP expanded by 0.4% q/q in the first quarter of 2014, which was the best performance since the first quarter of 2008 and up from growth of 0.2% q/q in the fourth quarter of 2013 and 0.1% q/q in the third quarter. This followed nine quarters of contraction up to and including the second quarter of 2013.Consequently; Spanish GDP was up 0.6% y/y in the first quarter of 2014, which was the equal best performance (with the first quarter of 2011) since the second quarter of 2008. Although this boosts hopes that Spain is establishing sustainable recovery despite still facing significant problems, the news is more troubling for Italy, where GDP dipped 0.1% q/q in the first quarter of 2014 and so was down 0.5% y/y.

Portugal

Portugal also suffered a marked hiccup in its recovery in the first quarter of 2014 as GDP fell 0.7% q/q. This followed three quarters of decent growth overall between the second and fourth quarters of 2013 as Portugal exited pronounced recession with some gusto. Consequently, Portuguese GDP was still up 1.2% y/y in the first quarter of 2014. 
Periphery
Greece continued to show signs of emerging from recession as its y/y contraction in GDP moderated to 1.1% in the first quarter of 2014. Greece is not releasing q/q GDP data currently and this was the smallest y/y drop since early 2010 and down from declines of 2.3% y/y in the fourth quarter of 2013 and 6.0% in the first quarter of last year. However, contraction in Cyprus slowed only modestly to 0.7% q/q and 4.1% y/y in the first quarter of 2014 from 0.8% q/q and 5.0% y/y in the fourth quarter of 2013. Finland went back into recession in the first quarter of 2014 as GDP fell 0.4% q/q and 0.8% y/y following a decline of 0.4% q/q in the fourth quarter of 2013. Estonia also suffered contraction in the first quarter of 2014, with GDP down by 1.2% q/q and 1.5% y/y. In better news, there was growth of 0.6% q/q and 2.0% y/y in Slovakia in the first quarter, while new Eurozone entrant Latvia achieved expansion of 0.7% q/q and 2.4% y/y. Data for Ireland and Slovenia are yet to be released (IHS, 2014).
Domestic Demand
No details were released of the component breakdown of first-quarter Eurozone GDP, but it looks possible that net trade may well have been a drag on Eurozone growth. German net trade was reported to have been negative in the first quarter as exports of goods fell and imports rose "markedly". In addition, net trade made a negative contribution of 0.2 percentage point to French GDP, while Portugal also suffered a "pronounced" negative contribution from net trade (IHS, 2014).
Domestic demand is likely to have been modestly positive across the Eurozone in the first quarter.According to IHS consumer spending saw moderate growth overall (given that Eurozone retail sales volumes rose 0.6% q/q in the first quarter). Improved consumer confidence (it hit a 78-month high in April), generally stabilising or modestly improving labour markets, and the help to purchasing power coming from very low inflation (it averaged just 0.7% in the first quarter) across the Eurozone probably provided some support to consumer spending in the first quarter. Nevertheless, with the number of Eurozone jobless still very high (the unemployment rate was still up at 11.8% in March) and consumers' purchasing power generally constrained by low earnings growth and tight fiscal policy, the upside for consumer spending clearly remained limited, especially in the southern periphery countries. It is also likely that total investment expanded overall across the Eurozone for a fourth successive quarter following extended weakness. Business confidence generally strengthened throughout the first quarter, building on gains seen during the final three quarters of 2013, which is likely to have made some businesses more prepared to invest to upgrade or replace capacity, or invest in IT, in order to improve productivity and efficiency, and/or reduce costs. Even so, there was still generally little need for most businesses to add capacity given generally low capacity utilisation rates in most sectors across the Eurozone.
Meanwhile, tight lending conditions, especially for smaller and medium-sized enterprises remained a constraint for investment. In addition, mild weather in the first quarter of 2014 clearly supported construction investment in a number of countries, notably Germany. It is also notable that a build-up of inventories contributed positively to growth in Germany and, especially, France.

Outlook
Latest survey evidence and data point overall to the Eurozone seeing modest improvement in economic activity during the second quarter. In particular, the composite output indicator for the Eurozone purchasing managers' indices (PMIs) for manufacturing and the service sector compiled by Markit Economics indicated a 10th successive month of expansion in April. Furthermore, the index climbed to a 35-month high of 54.0 in April from 53.1 in March and an average of 53.1 in the first quarter of 2014. However, economic sentiment across the Eurozone suffered a modest relapse in April after reaching a 32-month high in March, according to the European Commission. This was due to a modest falling back in sentiment across all business sectors (especially services and construction) outweighing a further increase in consumer confidence to a 78-month high in April. This is likely to have been at least partly a reflection of the fact that businesses are more worried than consumers about the potential impact of the Ukraine crisis on economic activity. Gradual Eurozone recovery is likely to be fuelled by improved business and consumer confidence (supported by reduced sovereign debt tensions), accommodative monetary policy, low inflation (just 0.7% across the Eurozone in April), and reduced fiscal tightening. Meanwhile, labour markets have largely stabilised across the Eurozone and are even improving marginally in some countries. Eurozone unemployment in March was 209,000 below the April 2013 record high of 19.122 million. Also helping matters, IHS expects global growth to improve to 3.0% in 2014 and 3.6% in 2015 from 2.5% in 2013, which should support Eurozone exports. Given this more stable and improving backdrop, businesses should become gradually more prepared to invest, especially given growing needs to upgrade or replace plant after extended weakness in capital spending.
Nevertheless, the Eurozone still faces significant growth constraints. Fiscal policy is still generally restrictive, despite increased flexibility over countries' fiscal targets, and tight credit conditions persist in several countries amid still significant banking sector problems. Unemployment remains elevated (the Eurozone unemployment rate was still up at 11.8% in March) and is unlikely to come down substantially any time soon, while consumer purchasing power is limited by low earnings growth. Furthermore, the euro's strength hinders Eurozone exporters: it hit a 30-month high of EUR1.00:USD1.399 in early May. Moreover, the performances of the French and Italian economies in the first quarter of 2014 reinforce concern over their outlooks and fuel suspicion that both countries will struggle for meaningful growth this year. Indeed, IHS expects Italian growth to be limited to 0.3% and French growth to 0.6% in 2014. It also highlights the pressing need in both countries to enact meaningful structural reforms. Spain also still faces significant obstacles that are likely to limit the upside for growth for some time to come (it is seen growing by 0.8% in 2014).
European Central Bank

Highlights
On June 5, 2014, the European Central Bank (ECB) announced its first change in policy since November 2013. These actions included:
·         Decreasing all three policy rates:Negative marginal deposit facility rate (-0.10%) for the first time in history; Main refinancing rate cut to 0.15%; Marginal lending facility rate cut to 0.40%
·         Creating targeted longer-term refinancing operations (TLTROs) in an effort to reduce interest rates in nonfinancial markets
·         Suspending "sterilization" program of previous asset purchase plan
·         Intensifying preparatory work for outright purchases of asset-backed securities (ABS)
The European Central Bank finally moved to counter sluggish growth, persistently high unemployment and the threat of deflation in the euro zone after months of dithering. By its own standards, the measures announced last week - which include taking a key deposit interest rate into negative territory - are bold, even historic. But market reactions have been, well, underwhelming. The bank's chief, Mario Draghi, may be finally doing what is necessary, but is it enough? He himself hinted at outright quantitative easing to come, which he has so far avoided implementing, should the new measures prove inadequate.

The ECB's move is effectively penalising banks for not putting money to work. Negative T-bill yields means governments will pay investors back less than they borrowed when the paper comes due. Policymakers hope negative rates in time will force money out of the financial system and into the real economy (Reuters, 2014).
What the negative deposit rates mean, essentially, is that commercial banks will be penalized for accumulating reserves rather than loaning out all of those fresh euros into the supposed “real” economy. The idea, at least according to the central planners at the ECB, is to force banks to loan out more of the funds to businesses and consumers.
This is a good strategy by the ECB but the caveat here is that despite the incentives, Banks will only lend out to businesses if they can trust their economic viability.But the credit channel appears to be blocked, People still don't have great confidence in the economy because growth is anaemic, inflation is low, household debt is fairly high and unemployment is high as well.
Critics have pointed out that the amount in deposits those banks have put away with the central bank are not great enough for the negative rate to make a big enough impact. And the benchmark rate cut is not likely to make them lend significantly more than before. In truth, funding for small to medium-sized companies remains at crisis level in the euro zone

The Keynesian/monetarist notion that monetary policy can drive an economy persists, despite chronic failures.


Conclusion
In the Euro Area, Q1 2014 seasonally adjusted GDP was recorded at 0.2%.Germany, UK and Spain led the way the overall growth, but it was undermined by contractions in Portugal, Spain, Greece, Cyprus, Italy will stagnation in France.Domestic demand was modestly positive across the Eurozone in the first quarter  with consumer spending seeing moderate growth overall.Improved consumer confidence generally stabilizing or modestly improving labour markets, and the help to purchasing power coming from very low inflation across the Eurozone probably provided some support to consumer spending in the first quarter.With the number of Eurozone jobless still very high and consumers' purchasing power generally constrained by low earnings growth and tight fiscal policy, the upside for consumer spending remained limited, especially in the southern periphery countries.Net trade was a drag on Eurozone growth while lending conditions remained tight, especially for smaller and medium-sized enterprises remained a constraint for investment. 
Latest survey evidence and data point overall to the Eurozone seeing modest improvement in economic activity during the second quarter.However, economic sentiment across the Eurozone suffered a modest relapse in April  likely to have been at least partly a reflection of the fact that businesses are more worried than consumers about the potential impact of the Ukraine crisis on economic activity.Gradual Eurozone recovery is likely to be fuelled by improved business and consumer confidence, accommodative monetary policy, low inflation , and reduced fiscal tightening. Meanwhile, labour markets have largely stabilised across the Eurozone and are even improving marginally in some countries. Given this more stable and improving backdrop, businesses should become gradually more prepared to invest, especially given growing needs to upgrade or replace plant after extended weakness in capital spending.
Nevertheless, the Eurozone still faces significant growth constraints. Fiscal policy is still generally restrictive, despite increased flexibility over countries' fiscal targets, and tight credit conditions persist in several countries amid still significant banking sector problems. Unemployment remains elevate and is unlikely to come down substantially any time soon, while consumer purchasing power is limited by low earnings growth. Furthermore, the euro's strength hinders Eurozone exporters.
On June 5, 2014, the European Central Bank (ECB) announced its first change in policy since November 2013 which included measures to fight the EU’s continued economic sluggishness, the head of the European Central Bank, Mario Draghi, unveiled a package of measures to prod banks to increase lending, most notably charging banks a negative interest rate for their deposits at the ECB, as well as a facility to give banks cheap four-year funds to lend to smaller businesses. Most notable of these measures is the negative interest rate on Bank deposits which is essentially, is that commercial banks will be penalized for accumulating reserves rather than loaning out all of those fresh euros into the supposed “real” economy. The idea, at least according to the central planners at the ECB, is to force banks to loan out more of the funds to businesses and consumers.This is a fairly eccentric and unprecedented strategy by the ECB but despite the incentives, Banks will only lend out to businesses if they can trust their economic viability.Currently the credit channel appears to be blocked, People still don't have great confidence in the economy because growth is anemic, inflation is low, household debt is fairly high and unemployment is high as well.Critics have pointed out that the amount in deposits those banks have put away with the central bank are not great enough for the negative rate to make a big enough impact. And the benchmark rate cut is not likely to make them lend significantly more than before. In truth, funding for small to medium-sized companies remains at crisis level in the euro zone. With precedence for unconventional monetary policy interventions already set and preparatory work for outright purchases of asset-backed securities intensifying, we could possibly see the ECB implement some form of Quantitative Easing, whether this tool is the right course of action is a matter of debate, because unlike the U.S it application might prove difficult in that the ECB will have to pick favorites on which assets to purchase. What will prove imperative will be the choice of which assets to purchase rather than the decision to act.
“      “In the wrong way, going the extra mile leads to frustration” ― Constance Chuks Friday

   References

Finfacts. (2014, May 15). Eurozone GDP expanded by an unimpressive 0.2% in Q1 2014. Retrieved June 20, 2014, from Fin facts: http://www.finfacts.ie/irishfinancenews/article_1027681.shtml
Forbes, S. (2014). The European Central Bank Can't Cure What Ails Europe. Retrieved June 20, 2014, from Forbes: http://www.forbes.com/sites/steveforbes/2014/06/18/the-european-central-bank-cant-cure-what-ails-europe/
Hennigan, M. (2014, May 15). Eurozone: German GDP growth accelerates in Q1 2014: France stuck in neutral at zero. Retrieved June 20, 2014, from Fin Facts: http://www.finfacts.ie/irishfinancenews/article_1027679.shtml
IHS. (2014, June 5). Eurozone Q1 GDP expansion limited to 0.2% q/q, hitting 2014. Retrieved June 20, 2014, from IHS: http://lis.ly.gov.tw:8080/economy_ly/data/news3.pdf
Reuters. (2014, June 17). Two-year German yields near zero as markets brace for European Central Bank cash. Retrieved June 20, 2014, from Financial Express: http://www.financialexpress.com/news/twoyear-german-yields-near-zero-as-markets-brace-for-european-central-bank-cash/1261534

World Bank. (2014, June 7). Russia's Monthly Economic Developments. Retrieved June 20, 2014, from World Bank: http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/russia/brief/monthly-economic-developments

Tuesday, June 17, 2014

China Q1 Economic analysis and Outlook by Kampamba Shula

China First Quarter Economy Analysis

Summary
The Chinese economy grew 7.4 percent in the first quarter of 2014 versus a year earlier, and was up 1.4 percent from the previous quarter. This slower growth was a continuation of the slowdown that has afflicted China during the past year, although growth remained in a range that the government has targeted. The big question is whether China can simultaneously sustain growth while reducing its dependence on credit expansion.
China’s GDP grew by 7.4 percent for the first quarter of 2014, lower than the government target of 7.5 percent, but ahead of most analyst estimates
• First quarter Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) remained in positive territory at 50.3, while the Consumer Price Index (CPI) held steady at 2.4 percent (versus the government’s 3.5 percent target for the year)
• ODI in non-financial sector decreased by 16.5 percent year-on-year in the first quarter, but a number of factors should propel total Chinese ODI for 2014 above levels reached in 2013
• Inbound FDI increased by 5.5 percent year-on-year, as China’s services industry buoyed investment growth

The Chinese economy grew by 1.4% this quarter.
Since the start of the year, most economic indicators have pointed to a pronounced slowdown in China, the fastest growing major economy for more than a decade and a powerful stabilizing force in the wake of the global financial crisis (Anderlini, 2014).

China's economy grew 7.4 percent year on year in the first quarter of 2014, the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) revealed recently.The NBS said that preliminary data showed the nation's gross domestic product (GDP) reached 12.8213 trillion yuan ($2.08 trillion) in the first quarter (China Daily, 2014).The figures suggest growth in the world's second-largest economy in the beginning of year 2014 was stable and that the economy was generally in good health, as Chinese authorities promoted reforms, innovation, restructuring and improvement of people's well-being, according to the NBS.
The first-quarter growth exceeded market estimates of 7.3 percent.
However, it slowed compared to the 7.7-percent growth in the fourth quarter of 2013, and marked the lowest quarterly growth level since the third quarter of 2012. But even so, the figure still far outperformed the 6.6-percent growth in the first quarter of 2009, when the global financial crisis wreaked havoc.During the same period, fixed asset investment growth gained 17.6 percent; retail sales expanded 12 percent, while the average per-capita disposable income of both urban and rural residents grew 8.6 percent year on year (China Daily, 2014).
The economic slowdown came amid a generally mild inflation rate in the first quarter, with the consumer price index, the main gauge of inflation, rising 2.4 percent in March.Earlier data also showed the country's exports and imports declined 1 percent year on year to $965.88 billion in the first quarter while power consumption rose 5.4 percent year on year, though the March figure picked up steam and rose 7.2 percent.
In China, imports and exports have contracted in the first three months in spite of predictions at the start of the year that stronger US and European demand would prop up slowing Chinese growth.
The services sector, which includes retail, made up 49 percent of gross domestic product in the first quarter, 4.1 percentage points more than the industrial sector.Growth in retail bodes well for employment, a top government priority, as services are now the biggest employer in China (Rose, 2014).
As most countries tumbled into recession following the collapse of Lehman Brothers in October 2008 China launched a massive state-led building boom that propped up domestic growth and global demand, particularly for commodities.But there is increasing evidence that China’s credit-fuelled, investment-heavy growth model has now reached its limits.There are worrying signs of overbuilding and oversupply in the Chinese real estate market, with sales volumes and prices having already collapsed in many smaller cities.Real estate construction accounted for as much as 16 per cent of GDP last year, a level approaching that in Ireland or Spain before their housing bubbles burst.A widespread property market crash would be devastating for Chinese investment, which accounts for an unprecedented high level of about half of GDP (Anderlini, 2014).
Beijing has announced some modest measures, such as tax cuts for small firms and speeding up investment in railways, to try to steady growth near its target of 7.5 percent without disrupting plans to restructure the economy or worsening problems of overcapacity and debt.
Although the official GDP growth figure for 2014 will likely be around 7.5 per cent, all of the economic momentum points downward. Export growth will probably be very modest, because the US economic recovery has been weaker than expected and the Chinese export sector is undergoing major restructuring due to a rapidly rising cost base. The upward trend in consumption should continue as rapid wage growth lifts household income, but public consumption may remain soft as a result of the government’s anti-corruption drive (Huang, 2014).
Fixed asset investment is still the main area in which the government acts to stabilise growth. But weakening market conditions in the property sector mean the outlook is not encouraging. Manufacturing investment should be relatively stable given the outlook for exports and consumption. The central government may increase infrastructure investment if the economy weakens again, but there is little room for local government action in this area because of a decline in revenue from land sales and the tightening in financing conditions for local government investment vehicles (LGIVs). Recently, the central government started an experiment allowing ten provincial governments to issue local government bonds (Huang, 2014).

China PMI

China’s manufacturing sector continues to decline, at least according to the latest PMI for manufacturing from Markit.1 The index moved from 48.0 in March to 48.1 in April. A reading below 50.0 means declining activity, so the index’s increase means that activity continued to decline, but at a slightly slower pace. This was the fourth consecutive month of decline. Separately, a Chinese government PMI for manufacturing indicates very modest manufacturing growth in April. The index was 50.4, up from 50.3 in March. The government index, separate from the better-known one issued by Markit, is heavily weighted toward state-owned companies. This report still suggests considerable weakness in the manufacturing sector. The subindex for export orders was especially weak at 49.1, indicating a decline in such orders. Some investors are hoping for more stimulatory measures by the Chinese central bank, such as a cut in the reserve ratio for banks. Yet boosting credit market activity is also risky because there may already be too much bad debt in the system and there is certainly excess capacity in industry. A more sustainable way to fix the economy would be to stimulate consumer spending rather than debt-fueled fixed asset investment.
Shadow Banking

It appears that, despite government efforts to the contrary, credit in the non-bank shadow banking system continues to rise rapidly. The government reports that, in the first quarter, trust company assets were up 8 percent from a year earlier. The country’s trust companies now have assets of 11.7 trillion Chinese yuan, or $1.9 trillion—a record high. The average return on trust assets has declined.
Recall that trust companies have been established to circumvent restrictions on formal banking. The trusts lend money to private enterprises (including property investors). They raise money by selling trust products to private investors, usually offering a return far higher than is available through formal banks. The trusts are often informally backed by banks. The problem is that trusts have loaned money for many projects that are not expected to generate positive returns. Increasingly, trusts could face trouble meeting their obligations and may require help from banks. Banks, in turn, could find themselves in trouble. Thus further growth of this shadow banking activity is worrisome. Although it contributes to economic growth in the short term, it creates more stress on the financial system in the longer run. It is thus not a sustainable model for future economic growth.
Size and Outlook

For some time, we’ve known that China’s economy would eventually overtake that of the United States. Most estimates had pointed to the later years of this decade. Yet now the World Bank estimates that China’s GDP will overtake that of the United States this year.
Two questions emerge: First, how is this determined? Second, does it even matter?
First, for the purposes of this exercise, the World Bank does not measure the size of China’s GDP at current exchange rates. If this were to be done, the US economy would still be far larger than that of China. Rather, the World Bank uses a “purchasing power parity” (PPP) exchange rate. That is, it converts China’s local-currency GDP to US dollars using an exchange rate that reflects the true purchasing power of the currency. How is this done? The World Bank takes a large basket of goods and services for the United States and determines the dollar price of this basket. Then it takes a similar basket in China and determines its renminbi price. The ratio of the renminbi price to the dollar price of this basket determines the PPP exchange rate. For example, if the US basket costs $100 and the Chinese basket costs 350 yuan, then the exchange rate is 350/100, or 3.5 yuan to the dollar—which is, in fact, roughly the World Bank’s estimate of the PPP exchange rate. Keep in mind that the current market exchange rate is roughly 6.2 yuan per dollar. The World Bank’s new figures on GDP are based on new estimates of the composition and price of that basket.

Second, does this matter? Not really. Clearly China has many residents, and its economy has grown very rapidly in recent years. The fact that it is now the world’s largest economy simply means that it generates enough goods and services to match the purchasing power of the United States. Yet China has four times as many people as the United States, so its per capita output is thus one-quarter that of the United States. In other words, it has a long way to go to match the living standards of affluent countries. Moreover, for a variety of reasons, China’s growth is likely to slow down in the future. Also, keep in mind that, at current exchange rates, the US economy is still far larger than that of China. In terms of China’s participation in the global economy, such as purchasing commodities and high-technology equipment from other countries, China’s purchasing power still lags considerably. The measure of GDP using a PPP exchange rate largely reflects the low prices of domestic services in China. For example, the prices of haircuts, restaurant meals, and health services are very low in China, thus effectively increasing the true purchasing power of a Chinese wage. This is one of the principal reasons for China being the “world’s largest” economy. From that perspective, the label is not very meaningful (Kalish, 2014).

Conclusion
There is increasing evidence that China’s credit-fueled, investment-heavy growth model has now reached its limits.There are worrying signs of overbuilding and oversupply in the Chinese real estate market, with sales volumes and prices having already collapsed in many smaller cities.Real estate construction accounted for as much as 16 per cent of GDP last year, a level indicating a possible housing bubbles about to burst.A widespread property market crash would be devastating for Chinese investment, which accounts for an unprecedented high level of about half of GDP. The manufacturing sectors still remains frail.Some investors are hoping for more stimulatory measures by the Chinese central bank, such as a cut in the reserve ratio for banks. Yet boosting credit market activity is also risky because there may already be too much bad debt in the system and there is certainly excess capacity in industry as evidenced by the shadow banks. A more sustainable way to fix the economy would be to stimulate consumer spending rather than debt-fueled fixed asset investment.Thus further growth of the shadow banking activity is worrisome. Although it contributes to economic growth in the short term, it creates more stress on the financial system in the longer run. It is thus a short term effective method but not a sustainable model for future economic growth.As the World Bank estimates that China’s GDP will overtake that of the United States this year this statistic has to be put in context as it is calculated using purchasing power of parity which underscores suggestions that China's renminbi is still undervalued. China still lags in terms of per capita income as well as standard of living but this should not discredit the Chinese government as its sound economic management polices cushioning the Chinese economy for a safe landing have proved bold in uncharted territory. We cannot take away from what is apparently clear to be an unprecedented economic growth management model. It may have it flaws but overall it is still a decent role model for developing nations.
Some Economist projections estimate China's economy will grow by 7.4% in 2014 just a tenth of a percentage point below the Chinese government projection of 7.5%. I project a growth of 7.6% on the anticipation of strong domestic consumption as Beijing might stimulate the economy by cutting reserve ratios to get an inflation rate much closer to its yearly target.

References

Anderlini, J. (2014, April 16). Slowing growth adds to China stimulus pressure. Retrieved June 17, 2014, from Financial times: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/ea52d1c6-c507-11e3-8dd4-00144feabdc0.html#axzz34uINUyuX
China Daily. (2014, April 16). China's first quarter GDP grows 7.4%. Retrieved June 17, 2014, from China Daily: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/business/chinadata/2014-04/16/content_17437546.htm
Huang, Y. (2014, June 15). Where will the Chinese economy land? Retrieved June 17, 2014, from East Asia Forum: http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2014/06/15/where-will-the-chinese-economy-land/
Kalish, I. (2014, May 21). Asia Pacific Economic Outlook, June 2014: China. Retrieved June 17, 2014, from Dupress: http://dupress.com/articles/asia-pacific-economic-outlook-june-2014-china-2/
Rose, A. (2014, April 16). China economic growth slows to 18-month low in first-quarter. Retrieved June 17, 2014, from Reuters: http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/04/16/us-china-economy-gdp-idUSBREA3F04J20140416



Wednesday, June 11, 2014

US Economy 2014 First Quarter Analysis and Outlook by Kampamba Shula


US Economy
New data shows the U.S. economy contracted in the first quarter of this year, keeping pace with shifting expectations but down sharply from the prior already disappointing estimate. (Sharf, 2014)
Starting with data stateside, the U.S. economy contracted for the first time in three years in Q1 2014 as output literally and figuratively froze under a severe winter. 

The slower pace of inventory accumulation and a larger-than-estimated trade deficit helped push the numbers to the worst performance since Q1 of 2011. Economists estimate severe weather could have reduced GDP growth by as much as 1.5%. (Lam, 2014)
The northern and eastern U.S. experienced above-average snowfall from December through February, keeping Americans closer to home and hampering production as factories had difficulty obtaining materials on time.
March quarter US GDP was revised sharply lower on the back of a significantly lower inventory investment.  The initial print of +0.1% (annualised) was revised down to -1.0%.  However, all the signs are pointing to a strong bounce back in growth in the second quarter of the year. The downward revision to inventories accounted for the entire GDP revision.  In total, inventories knocked 1.6 percentage points off GDP in the quarter.  The good news is that much of the inventory adjustment we expected to play out this year, and with that the drag on growth, has now already occurred.
The Bureau of Economic Analysis’ second estimate of real gross domestic product showed output produced in the U.S. declined at an annual rate of 1% in the first quarter of 2014. This is relative to fourth quarter 2013, when real GDP increased 2.6%.
That said, investors are not particularly worried as signs of a rebound are pointing Q2 estimates to as high as +4% in Q2 of which I have personal reservations about. As weather-related factors fade, inventories are expected to swing higher and boost output in Q2. In addition, bullish jobs data also bolstered the case for a rebounding economy as initial claims dropped 27,000 to a seasonally adjusted 300,000 last week. Initial claims, a measure of the underlying labor market conditions, hit its lowest level since August 2007. And when you accumulate positive existing home sales, recent manufacturing and inventories data, the numbers fit to the overall picture of steadily improving market conditions and a recovering economy.
Companies boosted stockpiles by $49 billion in the first quarter, less than the $111.7 billion in the final three months of 2013. Inventories subtracted the most from GDP since the fourth quarter of 2012. Slower inventory accumulation may encourage factories to step up production should demand accelerate.
Consumer purchases, which account for about 70 percent of the economy, increased at a 3.1 percent annualized rate in the first quarter. The gain, which added 2.1 percentage points to GDP, was more than the previous estimate of 3 percent.
The increase reflected a stronger pace of spending on services, including utilities as colder winter weather prompted Americans to adjust their thermostats. Spending for health care picked up as the provisions of the Affordable Care Act went into effect.

When it comes to forecasting near-term real GDP growth,  there are parts of the economy that are easy to follow and then  there parts of it that are tough.  The easy parts (with lots of timely information) are consumer spending, business investment, and home building.  And despite one of the worst winters in multiple decades, this portion of the economy looks like it grew at a solid 2.5% to 3% annual rate in the first quarter, right in-line with the trend since the recession ended in mid-2009.  To get that kind of growth during this past brutal winter means the underlying fundamentals of the economy are gathering strength. Now that banks are more confident the Fed’s balance sheet isn’t going to shrink anytime soon, the M2 money supply and commercial and industrial loans are both accelerating. Meanwhile, the recovery in home building is still far from complete and low business and consumer debt obligations mean plenty of room for growth in purchases of big-ticket items
But is some of this optimism by economists on the second quarter exaggerated?
As Zero Hedge has pointed out, if it wasn't for dramatically increased healthcare spending due to the implementation of Obamacare, U.S. GDP would have actually dropped at a 2 percent annual rate during the first quarter of 2014.
BEA — a division of the Department of Commerce – will release its third and final Q1 GDP estimate on June 25.
Second Quarter Rebound
Mike Jakeman, global analyst for The Economist Intelligence Unit, noted that private consumption growth was revised up. This, he wrote, “suggests that there is some real momentum behind consumer spending. Given that households account for 70% of GDP, we remain confident that the economy will bounce back strongly in the second quarter.”
RBS Economist Guy Berger also takes an optimistic view. He pointed out in a note that much of the downward revision was due to inventories which were built up at the end of 2013 and trade deficit.
Growth in key indicators such as employment, income, and consumer spending have recently begun to improve from weather-affected levels earlier in the year, according to Robert Niblock, the chief executive officer at home-improvement retailer Lowe’s Cos., said recently.
Stock Market
Stock market punters are gambling on a strong rebound in GDP in the second quarter to justify the recent extension of gains to new all-time highs. The reality of the economic backdrop looks rather different.
Stock prices are high by historic multiples because the outlook is supposed to be a breakout into a new era of high growth for the US economy. We are now actually almost two-thirds through Q2 and the data at best gives mixed signals about an economy bouncing along the bottom. For investors the issue is how to square this near recession with a rampantly optimistic stock market trading at record highs, albeit on lowish volumes crowded into a few stocks.

The Fed

The Fed continues to taper at a pace of $10 billion per month. Fed Chair, Janet Yellen, has stated that tapering is not on a set course, although at this rate tapering will be complete by fall of 2014. In the March FOMC meeting there was a change to forward guidance, removing the 6.5 percent unemployment target and shifting to more qualitative measurements.In addition, in the March FOMC meeting, Yellen said that rates could be increased as soon as six months after tapering ends. Markets reacted to the March FOMC meeting by selling off and increasing volatility.
Domestic Economy

The U.S. economy continues to expand thanks to the consumer and less fiscal drag.The consumer has benefited from rising home prices and equity markets. The first quarter saw a pull back on personal consumption due to extraordinarily cold weather in the Northeast.The rise in household net worth boosted spending and overall sentiment. Household worth continues to hit all-time highs.Most measures of the housing and employment markets confirm improving trends; however, the pace of improvement is slower than we prefer.Inflation continues to run well below the Fed’s target measure of 2 percent. (Silicon Valley Asset Management, 2014)
Q1 spending activity pulled back due to extraordinary weather conditions.
·         Consumers were less optimistic towards the end of the quarter with consumer confidence falling to a four-month low.
·         Disposable incomes rose the most in February since September 2013 at 2.1 percent year-over-year.
·         Consumer spending expanded by 3.3 percent in the final quarter of 2013, the biggest increase in three years.
·         As the winter cold passes consumers will start to feel positive again.
Housing

Total housing sales have suffered from recent uptick in rates.
·         Housing starts have improved recently, but have far to go given continued population growth. Starts are most important to the overall economy due to associated purchases and economic transactions.
·         Home prices remain in an upward trend, but momentum has paused recently. If employment continues to grow, look for housing statistics to also continue moving upward.
·         The homeownership rate seems to be bottoming, providing significant support for all aspects of the housing sector.
·         Home affordability has struggled in the recent quarter. However, it would take a significant jump in mortgage rates to make home ownership markedly less affordable.
·         Foreclosures continue to drop quickly as resolutions to REO holdings are offered by alternative investors.
Inflation
·         Core PCE continues to be well below the Fed’s target of 2 percent.
·         The Fed has acknowledged that inflation has been running below its long-term objective.
·         Despite being on the tapering track, the Fed is still open to accommodative monetary policy.
·         The Fed plans to monitor inflation developments carefully in search of evidence that inflation will move towards its target.
      Conclusion
      The first quarter growth was "frozen" by the extreme winter experienced in the US.The slower pace of inventory accumulation and a larger-than-estimated trade deficit helped push the numbers to the worst performance approximately reducing GDP growth by as much as 1.5%. But despite one of the worst winters in multiple decades,Consumer spending expanded by 3.3 percent in the first quarter of 2014, the biggest increase in three years.To get that kind of growth during this past brutal winter means the underlying fundamentals of the economy are gathering strength.Given that households account for 70% of GDP, we can remain confident that the US economy will bounce back strongly in the second quarter.Home prices remain in an upward trend, but momentum has paused recently.Core Inflation continues to be well below the Fed’s target of 2 percent.Fed Chair, Janet Yellen, has stated that tapering is not on a set course, although at this rate tapering will be complete by fall of 2014. In the March FOMC meeting there was a change to forward guidance, removing the 6.5 percent unemployment target and shifting to more qualitative measurements.Some Economists have been bold enough to estimate a growth of +4 in Q2, But we at Economeka have a slightly more modest estimation of +2.5% for the second Quarter.


  Bibliography

Lam, M. (2014, June 3). US Economy Retracts in Q1 but shows signs of Q2 Rebound | Economic Update. Retrieved June 11, 2014, from Samuel Scott: http://www.samuelscottfg.com/us-economy-retracts-in-q1-but-shows-signs-of-q2-rebound-economic-update
Sharf, S. (2014, May 29). U.S. GDP Dropped 1% In The First Quarter 2014, Down From First Estimate. Retrieved June 11, 2014, from Forbes: http://www.forbes.com/sites/samanthasharf/2014/05/29/u-s-gdp-dropped-1-in-the-first-quarter-2014-down-from-first-estimate/
Silicon Valley Asset Mangement. (2014). Quarterly Analysis US Economy.