Zambian 2013 Budget Reviewed by Kampamba Shula

On 12 October 2012, the Minister of Finance, Hon. Alexander Bwalya Chikwanda, MP, announced the 2013 National Budget. Budget highlights and taxation and other changes as contained in the Budget speech and the Zambia Revenue Authority (“ZRA”) publication.

INDECO (IDC): Past Problems and Opportunities Analysed by Kampamba Shula

INDECO (IDC): Past Problems and Opportunities Analysed

Critical Review of IMF 2013 Zambia ARTICLE IV CONSULTATION report by Kampamba Shula

Debt management is still on track The agreed norm is that for internal borrowing the threshold is 25 per cent of GDP but our debt stands at K17 billion, which is 15 per cent of GDP and for external borrowing, the threshold is 40 per cent and our debt is US$3.1 billion which is 14 per cent of GDP, so we are far below the agreed norms. So even in the long term , Zambia is still on track.

US Economy 2014 First Quarter Analysis and Outlook by Kampamba Shula

New data shows the U.S. economy contracted in the first quarter of this year, keeping pace with shifting expectations but down sharply from the prior already disappointing estimate.

Zambia Debt Analysis

Some might say that Zambia should not borrow externally and even as sincere as they may be they are wrong. When the Government borrows locally “Crowing out” happens.

Showing posts with label Fuel Hike. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fuel Hike. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 22, 2013

Subsidy Example,Inflation,Problems and Solutions by Kampamba Shula



Mealie Meal subsidy example
A lot of people have been having trouble understanding the subsidy in simple terms so I decided to break the ice here with a clear example.
A farmer has two sons and a brother. Every day he wakes up before everyone and goes into the field to work. Before he leaves, he gives his brother money for house essentials and transport for the sons to school.
The two sons go to different schools. One son is called “Biggie” and the other is called “Smalls”. Sometimes the money for house essentials and transport is not enough and one of the sons has to walk to school instead of using transport, Smalls usually walks while Biggie takes transport. Smalls ends ups missing some of his classes because he is usually late.
Exam time comes and Biggie passes while Smalls fails .The farmer asks the teacher why this is so and the teacher tells him that Smalls misses some his classes and comes late. He goes home and finds out that Smalls misses classes because transport is not enough some times.
This is what the farmer chooses to do. He removes the money he usually includes for transport so that both sons walk to school. He saves this money and goes into town to buy both sons quality textbooks.
At the next exam both sons pass with good marks.
Now in this story the Farmer is the Zambian Government, the Brother is the Food and Reserve Agency (FRA).The two sons Biggie and Smalls are The Big Millers and Small Millers respectively. The transport money is the subsidy which sometimes only goes to the Big Millers. The teacher is the economist and the textbook is the expenditure that Zambian Government wants to use to build universities and schools and hospitals.
This is not an accurate example but is the closest by comparison.

Subsidy Explanation
After the recent subsidy removal by the Zambian Government there has been massive speculation that general prices in the country will go up and by extension Inflation will go up.
Now this article addresses those concerns with Inflation data from the last 5 months.
Just so we are all on the same page firstly what is Inflation??
In economics, inflation is a rise in the general level of prices of goods and services in an economy over a period of time. When the general price level rises, each unit of currency buys fewer goods and services (Abel & Bernanke, 2005).
The term "inflation" originally referred to increases in the amount of money in circulation, and some economists still use the word in this way. However, most economists today use the term "inflation" to refer to a rise in the price level. An increase in the money supply may be called monetary inflation, to distinguish it from rising prices, which may also for clarity be called 'price inflation' (Bryan, October 15 1997).
The Inflation rate is calculated as the change in the consumer price index. The consumer price index measures movements in prices of a fixed basket of goods and services purchased by a "typical consumer" (Mankiw, 2002).
We must now look at the fixed basket of Goods and services and their weights in the consumer price index to find out the effect of the removal of subsidies in Mealie Meal.
Now according to the JCTI Basic food item basket which comprises of Foods like Mealie Meal, Cooking Oil, beans, beef, eggs, Kapenta, tomatoes, onions, vegetables  and other essentials.

Mealie Meal
Mealie Meal accounts for 14 % of the basic food item basket. A 7 % change in the price of Mealie Meal would have a 1% change in the basic food basket.
In September 2011, the Government of Zambia started heavily subsidizing the price of maize held by the Food Reserve Agency (FRA) to maize millers. The expectation was that, by receiving maize at subsidized prices, millers would pass along the subsidy to Zambian consumers in the form of lower retail maize meal prices (Jayne, September 2012).
 Retail maize meal prices have remained virtually constant since September 2011. These findings indicate that very little of the treasury costs incurred in providing FRA grain to millers at below-market prices have benefited urban consumers
THE Millers Association of Zambia (MAZ) says the removal of the subsidy on maize does not necessarily mean that prices of mealie-meal will go up.
MAZ president Allan Sakala says the removal of the subsidy will provide a favourable competition in the milling sector and will create a positive impact on the prices of mealie-meal.
Assuming all things remaining equal the removal of subsidies will not change the price Mealie Meal by any significant margin.

Fuel Subsidy
The Fuel subsidy is however a different matter altogether.

This is a graph of Inflation since the beginning of the year. My calculations lead to an inference that the effect of a 15% percent fuel increase will lead to a possible 1/10 or 1/5 of a percentage point. In other words the Inflation might go up from 6.5 up to 6.7% in the short term.
In the more medium term, that is, later in the year however Inflation might spike up further as the poor harvest of 2012/2013 comes into price effect as well as the effects of expected inflation and as I worry built in inflation.
The reasons for this are as follows using the JCTI basic family basket expenditure. First and foremost the Fuel increase will directly affect the cost of production. This will create an incentive for companies to pass that on to their consumers as a higher price, this may be done gradually or immediately but the eventual effect will see more relatively price inelastic goods absorb the price increases.
An example of a price inelastic good is Mealie Meal. Price elasticity refers to the change in demand of a good given a change in its price. Mealie meal is relatively price inelastic because a change in its price will not change its demand by any significant margin. This is for the reason that if the price of Mealie Meal goes up, people will still buy Mealie Meal.
Secondly, transport costs across the board will go up after the 15% increase. The translation of this to a general price increase will depend upon the type of goods sold and the distance covered to get them to their required destination.
Thirdly and most worryingly is what is called in economics as Built in Inflation. In simple terms what people expect Inflation or general prices to be in the near future also matters, If they expect prices to increase this will have repercussions.
Built-in inflation is induced by adaptive expectations, and is often linked to the "price/wage spiral". It involves workers trying to keep their wages up with prices (above the rate of inflation), and firms passing these higher labor costs on to their customers as higher prices, leading to a 'vicious circle'. Built-in inflation reflects events in the past, and so might be seen as hangover inflation.
The Built in Inflation I speak of will come into effect in September 2013.Let me explain why.
Government has increased salaries for civil servants with some getting as high as 200 percent effective September 1, 2013 (Lusaka Times, 2013).The windfall follows the successful conclusion of negotiations between Government and the Civil Servants and Allied Workers Union of Zambia (CSAWUZ).
Other benefits in the 2013 collective bargaining include the introduction of the health personnel shift allowance at 15 percent of basic salaries for nurses and other paramedics. The commuted night-duty allowance has been pegged at7%.
Transport and housing allowances have been maintained at the existing rates of 10 and 20% of basic salaries respectively. But given the Government’s recent hike in fuel, workers have valid grounds on which to demand their transport allowances be adjusted to absorb the Price hike, this I fear could cause the Vicious circle.
Solutions
Eleanor Roosevelt said "It is better to light a candle than to curse the darkness". I do not aim to attack the Zambian Government; all I wish to do is give solutions to problems.
Problem 1
High price of Fuel due to in Zambia compared to other countries due to losses in
•          Feedstock Procurement to Dar es Salaam
•          Comparison of CIF Dar es Salaam prices paid by GRZ in 2008 & 2009 with reference (spot) prices shows over-payment. ‘The total “overcharge” vs good international practice was…..US$ 93 million over the two years or 12.5% of total CIF costs 

Solution 1
An agreement is signed to purchase fuel (oil) using futures and options.
What is a Future?
A futures contract gives the buyer the obligation to purchase a specific asset, and the seller to sell and deliver that asset at a specific future date, unless the holder's position is closed prior to expiration
What is an option?
An option gives the buyer the right, but not the obligation to buy (or sell) a certain asset at a specific price at any time during the life of the contract
Why will this work?
Because the Zambian Government has been procuring Fuel (Oil) at spot rates, in other words they have been paying for what the price of fuel is at the time. This created a 5% loss compared to other countries that use OMC at this stage.
 Fuel prices change every day and month, Options and futures reduce the risk of loss to such volatility.



References
Abel, A., & Bernanke, B. (2005). Macroeconomics (5th ed.). In A. Abel, & B. Bernanke, Macroeconomics (5th ed.). Pearson.
Bryan, M. F. (October 15 1997). On the Origin and Evolution of the Word 'Inflation. In M. F. Bryan, On the Origin and Evolution of the Word 'Inflation. Federal Bank Of Cleveland.
Lusaka Times. (2013, March 27). Civil servants get pay rise. Retrieved May 22, 2013, from Lusaka Times: http://www.lusakatimes.com/2013/03/27/civil-servants-get-pay-rise/
Mankiw, N. G. (2002). Macroeconomics (5th ed.). . In N. G. Mankiw, Macroeconomics (5th ed.). Worth.


Jayne, A. N. (September 2012). Is the Government of Zambia’s Subsidy to Maize Millers. Lusaka Zambia: Indaba Agricultural Policy Research Institute (IAPRI).

Monday, May 6, 2013

High Fuel Price & Refinery Industry in Zambia Analysed by Kampamba Shula



The Zambian government last week announced that fuel prices will go up by 21% after removing the subsidies. The removal of subsidies is a good theoretical move but I must disagree in the execution of it.
Now most people would ask how come I don’t like the removal of the subsidy even though conventional economics says subsidies bring about inefficiencies. Let’s get one thing straight, the subsidy should have never been there in the first place Zambia does not produce any oil. But if you look at the comparisons Zambia’s price of fuel remains substantially higher than other countries that also do not have any oil, so where is THE problem, we must find THAT problem and solve THAT problem.

But given the fact that the subsidy was in place, you don’t wake up one morning and suddenly remove it like that, it is bad execution. Watch how and where Economeka differs with the Energy Minister.
Energy Minister: FUEL prices have been hiked by an average KR1.69 per litre following the government’s decision to scrap fuel subsidy which had kept the local pump prices unchanged for almost two years. Energy minister Yamfwa Mukanga told journalists in Lusaka last week that the price for a litre of diesel has been adjusted upwards by KR1.63 while that of petrol has gone up by KR1.75.This means that a litre of petrol which initially was costing KR8.16 will now fetch KR9.91 while a litre of diesel which was costing KR7.50 will now cost KR9.13.A litre of kerosene will now be fetching KR1.68 more than it used to.
According to Mukanga, the fuel subsidy has been a huge drain on government coffers.
Economeka: Indeed the subsidy has been a drain on government coffers we totally agree. No argument there.
Energy Minister: Last year, the government spent KR754 million on fuel subsidies, an amount equivalent to 70 per cent of the total health sector budget minus personal emoluments. The government has already spent KR1,195 million on fuel subsidies in the first and second quarter of this year, Yamfwa said, adding that the fuel subsidies, which were introduced by the MMD government to cushion the poor and vulnerable in society, have not benefited the ordinary people.
“Current evidence suggests that the poor have benefited the least from this measure,” he said.
“It is key consumers of fuel – the mining industries and urban dwellers that are able to own their vehicles – that have [instead] benefited the most from this measure. In view of this, it is inevitable that the fuel subsidy is removed and fuel prices adjusted effective midnight, 30th April 2013.”
Economeka: Now this where I choose to disagree with the Honorable Minister. To mining industries and urban dwellers the change in fuel price is minimal and can be easily absorbed. But for the ordinary Zambian this is taking money right out of their pockets. Fuel is a sensitive product. It affects the pricing of so many other products across the board. The same poor people you refer to in your evidence are the ones who are going to feel the pinch of this fuel hike, ordinary people won’t even be bothered that much.
Energy Minister: “In addition, taxes on fuel will in future be reflected in absolute and not percentage terms as a way to mitigate increases in the price of fuel. This measure, however, requires changes in the law and will therefore be considered at the next sitting of parliament.”
Economeka: this is the biggest problem we have with the removal of the subsidy. We don’t refute the need to remove the subsidy, but in an effort to cushion the public from its effects, would it not have been prudent to first get the taxes on fuel to be reflected in absolute and not percentage terms first (effectively reducing the price of fuel), then remove the subsidy bringing it back to equilibrium levels. We estimate few people would have noticed the change.
We at Economeka firmly believe there are structural problems that need to be dealt with first. Our Colleagues at the Zambian Economist (www.zambian-economist.com) outlined this 3 step plan. 
STEP 1 : remove subsidies on fuel prices and stop the rampant and retrogressive waste of resources there (which disproportionately benefits urban folk) - DONE.
STEP 2: return Indeni to profit making levels and increase investment, as well as normalising supply of fuel across the country - BEING DONE.
We have seen many wonderful statements which have being made by Ministry of Mines and Energy that has signalled significant progress in this area.  For example, the 10 million litres Lusaka-West Fuel storage terminal is now operational. The Ministry of Energy says Government has embarked on the construction of other storage facilities in Mongu, Mpika and Solwezi to increase the number of delivery Fuel points in the country. That excellent development is critical in stabilising oil supply across the country in the short term.
It was also announced that Indeni Petroleum Refinery will start declaring dividends to its sole shareholder, GRZ, for the first time in 20 years. Government has run Indeni since Total SA pulled out in 2009. Last year, Indeni’s Managing Director Maybin Noole stated that Indeni had posted profits amounting to KR80 million in 2010 and KR54 million in 2011. Of course Indeni needs this money but the process of declaring dividends is vital in ensuring transparency and public accountability - something we have lacked in the past. It shows that change is happening in this area.
Other sectors also appear to benefiting from the new shift in this area. It was recently announced that we are expected to produce at least 100,000 cubic litres of bitumen-based fuel per day once the manufacturing plant currently under rehabilitation at Indeni Petroleum Refinery starts operating. 75 per cent of rehabilitation works had so far been completed and it will be ready to produce bitumen in August or thereabouts. The plant had been non-operational for the past 10 years but will soon roar to life.
This is good news. The government has invested US$20 million for Bitumen production. The huge quantities of bitumen are needed to complete the Link Zambia 8000 and pave Zambia 2000 road projects. It is allegedly currently costing Government US$1,200 to import a cubic litre of bitumen from South Africa and the Middle East. The plant is a huge leap forward.
These and many other positive changes underline the determination make progress under Step 2 that requires wide support from ordinary Zambians if this sector is to improve. Without public support change will not be possible. But change also requires bold leadership and it is clear that the Ministry of Mines and Energy is making important strides and ministers must be commended for their boldness.  
STEP 3: reform the wholesale fuel supply system consisting of fuel imports, transportation, and processing. This supply system is dominated by a vertically integrated government monopoly consisting of Tazama Pipelines Limited, the Indeni Petroleum Refinery Company Ltd., and the Ndola Fuel Terminal.
Because there's no competition, this system suffers from operational and structural inefficiencies, therefore high costs, the burden of which is shared by ordinary Zambian consumers. (and previously by taxpayers through subsidies which were meant to keep fuel costs low but have now thankfully been removed). The energy regulator (ERB) is unable to control costs effectively. Indeed, it cannot without sorting out the fuel supply system.
Part of the solution to the supply chain issues is to remove the 25% import duties on petroleum finished products so that prices can be reduced across board. The duty exists largely to protect Indeni. Indeni of course needs protection because Government is not just interested in stable fuel prices but also to ensure a uniform price across the country (Mukanga, 2013).
The Problems
•             Why are costs so high?
•             What is the Role of Government
•             TAZAMA / Indeni not competitive & dependent on tariff protection
•             Costs & security risks of relying solely on TAZAMA / Indeni
•             Case for liberalisation / import of finished products by OMCs
Why are Fuel costs so high in Zambia?


Fuel is high because of Inefficiencies in:
Feedstock Procurement to Dar es Salaam
Comparison of CIF Dar es Salaam prices paid by GRZ in 2008 & 2009 with reference (spot) prices shows over-payment
‘The total “overcharge” vs good international practice was…..US$ 93 million over the two years’ (Matthews 2010) , or 12.5% of total CIF costs 
TAZAMA pipeline is the only supply of Oil in the country. Inefficiencies along this mode of transportation are protected traits of a monopoly.
Indeni
Indeni refinery has a limited capacity of 1.1 million tons a year. ‘Economies of scale are particularly important for refining…..As a basic rule of thumb, a refinery needs to have a processing capacity of at least … 5 million tons a year… to be economic in a liberalized market.  ….A sub-economic-scale refinery is unlikely to be able to compete with product imports from large and efficiently run refineries’ (Kojima et al, 2010)
Distribution
·         Distribution throughout Zambia by OMCs from a single point, Indeni, increases transport costs and supply risks
·         Chipata is 900 km from Ndola, but only 140 km from Lilongwe
·         Fuel costs are lower in Malawi
·         Can Eastern Province obtain supplies more cheaply through Malawi?
Monopoly
·         TAZAMA / Indeni is a monopoly supplier
·         Monopolies usually have higher costs & prices than competitive markets

Government Involvement
·         No market failure – OMCs will supply
·         Most governments in region leave fuel supply to OMCs
·         Paying for feedstock can disrupt budget releases to conventional public services
·         Fiscal loss / unbudgeted subsidy of US$ 90 million in 2009


Cost of Production
The Private Sector Development Association (PSDA) has said the recent fuel hike, coupled with the imminent upward adjustment of electricity tariffs, will impact negatively on investment in the country.
Association chairperson Yusuf Dodia said this was because the cost of doing business is likely to go up in all sectors of the country’s economy. Mr. Dodia told ZANIS in an interview  that because of these developments, it will be difficult to stimulate the growth of the economy. “Our biggest worry is that prices of fuel and electricity are going up. This means that the cost of doing business in whatever sector will go up,” he said. He said the expected rise in the cost of production might cause Zambia to be less competitive than her neighbouring countries as the local products will be more expensive than the imported goods (Lusaka Voice, 2013).
And a Lusaka based economist Trevor Simumba has advised government to consult stakeholders each time it wants to effect a new policy. Mr. Simumba said it was important for government to get the input of various stakeholders on its policy pronouncements so that such policies have the reflection of all interested parties. Mr. Simumba said the removal of fuel subsidies will impact negatively on consumers  as the prices of basic commodities will go up. He said the very poor people that government said were not benefiting from the subsidies will be the same that will feel the pinch of the increase (Lusaka Voice, 2013).
Solution to the cost of Fuel
A recent parliamentary report on the state of petroleum industry in Zambia is embedded below. It notes that :
"....petroleum products in Zambia, which are the highest in the region, could be cheaper....fuel products are being kept superficially high due to impediments in the petroleum sector which include issues of policy, planning, recapitalisation, procurement and taxation...".
The problems facing oil supply in Zambia are the same problems facing maize marketing. Inefficient government involvement in systems where its role should be purely to maintain strategic reserves and leave the rest to market forces, underpinned by appropriate favourable taxation framework (Mukanga, 2013)
The Solutions
·         Pump prices must be reduced by cutting costs not taxes.
·         GRZ Could sell its shares in Indeni and remove the protection
·         Distribution sources need to be diversified to reduce transport costs. Each province can get oil from its nearest country ie. North western from Angola and Eastern from Malawi.
·         Liberalisation can reduce pump prices & increase reliability without hurting GRZ revenue
·         Removing Indeni’s tariff protection & encouraging OMCs to import finished products directly means
·         Improved efficiency from competition
·         Lower transport costs, as provinces are served from nearest port (eg Eastern - Nacala, Lusaka – Beira, Northern – Dar)
·         End of nationwide shortages
·         No further public investment (except storage), so GRZ can focus on public services 


 Bibliography

Lusaka Voice. (2013, May 2). Lusaka Voice. Retrieved May 6, 2013, from PSDA worried about fuel price hike: http://lusakavoice.com/2013/05/02/psda-worried-about-fuel-price-hike/
Mukanga, C. (2013, May 3). Zambian Economist. Retrieved March 6, 2013, from Bold Leadership on Fuel Prices: http://www.zambian-economist.com/2013/05/bold-leadership-on-fuel-prices.html


Kojima et al, (2010) Economies of Scale for Refining
Mathews ( 2010) . International Oil Refinery Practice