Zambian 2013 Budget Reviewed by Kampamba Shula

On 12 October 2012, the Minister of Finance, Hon. Alexander Bwalya Chikwanda, MP, announced the 2013 National Budget. Budget highlights and taxation and other changes as contained in the Budget speech and the Zambia Revenue Authority (“ZRA”) publication.

INDECO (IDC): Past Problems and Opportunities Analysed by Kampamba Shula

INDECO (IDC): Past Problems and Opportunities Analysed

Critical Review of IMF 2013 Zambia ARTICLE IV CONSULTATION report by Kampamba Shula

Debt management is still on track The agreed norm is that for internal borrowing the threshold is 25 per cent of GDP but our debt stands at K17 billion, which is 15 per cent of GDP and for external borrowing, the threshold is 40 per cent and our debt is US$3.1 billion which is 14 per cent of GDP, so we are far below the agreed norms. So even in the long term , Zambia is still on track.

US Economy 2014 First Quarter Analysis and Outlook by Kampamba Shula

New data shows the U.S. economy contracted in the first quarter of this year, keeping pace with shifting expectations but down sharply from the prior already disappointing estimate.

Zambia Debt Analysis

Some might say that Zambia should not borrow externally and even as sincere as they may be they are wrong. When the Government borrows locally “Crowing out” happens.

Friday, August 31, 2012

The Case for Zero Rated Inputs in Zambian Agriculture

Zero rating implies that goods are taxable but at a 0% rate. What would be the point of this? The significance of zero rating is that it allows businesses claim back their input taxes in acquiring these goods from suppliers for sale. In light of the financial reforms preventing use of foreign currency in Zambian trade, this may be a necessary measure to prevent the agricultural sector from suffocating from the effects of high production costs. 

High costs of production are partly attributable to the high cost of inputs, 90% of which are imported. The instability of the Zambian Kwacha has meant that to minimise price fluctuation in the consumer market, agro-suppliers have in the past conducted trade with exporters in more stable foreign currencies. Anti-dollarisation has implied a need to buffer consumer prices by higher percentages to minimise losses attributable to inflation. This has seen food prices rise astronomically and the trend is set to continue if mitigating measures are not put in place.

A proposed mitigating measure might be a zero rating tax policy for agro-suppliers. The proportion of the market price that is buffered to account for currency valuation fluctuations would be significantly reduced by the ability of the suppliers to reclaim taxes paid on importing the goods in the first place. The buyer, who in this case is the farmer, also wins because such an instrument implies that they too pay no value added tax on 
these goods. These lower prices then trickle down to the rest of us in the form of lower food prices.

A caveat exists in that zero rating reduces revenue for the government so it has to be used in conjunction with alternative revenue sources. The policy has been tried in South Africa's agricultural sector and has so far proved to improve the welfare of the poorest in society without impacting negatively on other households. It has also lent itself to a transformation of a retrogressive Value Added Tax on other goods to the creation of a more progressive structure.

Granted, the economic structure of South Africa is greater advanced than that of Zambia but there is no harm in mapping and modifying best practice to suit our own economic climate. Now this in my opinion would do a better job of putting 'more money in our pockets' without robbing others blind.

Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Opinion Piece- Wage Wars in Zambia


A minimum wage sets the lower limit of what employees earn from their labours. The problem with the ongoing debate on the use of this economic tool in Zambia is that the debate does not seem to adequately reflect progression to a living wage.

The living wage is two-fold, it must be met by both the employee and their employer. The necessary considerations as to whether raising the minimum wage by over a hundred percent makes economic sense ought to put into perspective the basic principles of undergraduate economics of supply and demand. In as much as demand for the proposed increments in minimum wage continues to be resounded, Zambia's financial and economic leaders are characteristically mute about what or who is going to supply this demand. While the real wages of salaried employees continue to diminish because of inflation instability owing to yet another 'dragon' of a measure in the guise of anti-dollarisation (which deserves an article to itself), they have to contemplate forgoing even more of the diminished income by meting out wage increments beyond the scope of what I think is rational thinking.

The dismissal of the linkage between the minimum  wage and living wage simply reverses the current status quo by pushing those in lower income jobs to a level of affordable living whilst pushing their employers out of the realm of affordable living by virtue of having to pay unrealistic and unsustainable wage bills, in the context of the Zambian economy. The current government's political ammunition has been the promise of 'more money in your pockets'. The little disclaimer they forgot to attach to that is this money seems to be merely shifting from the pockets of approximately 750,000 to meet the hundred percent plus minimum wage increments of at least 2,386,000 people. This basically means that the 'average' salaried employer needs to meet the wage demands of at least 3 employees (targeted in this instance are house helpers, gardeners and security guards).

Without trying to come off as an unpatriotic citizen, I am compelled to ask the question- what then is the role of the government in increasing the welfare of ALL Zambians and not just of those that they believe put them in power? Is it to merely manipulate the legislative system and play 'Robin Hood' by redistributing wealth from those just getting by to those employed by them? My naivety in using a purely academic approach to this issue may be redressed by insightful comments from those that may have a better understanding of the issue than I do- it is on this note that I invite you all to contribute to this forum with questions and comments on a matter that affects us all. All opinions and shared knowledge  are respected.

Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Apple Inc Stock Analysis Complied By Kampamba Shula


Company Description
Apple Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively "Apple" or the "Company") designs, manufactures and markets mobile communication and media devices, personal computers, and portable digital music players, and sells a variety of related software, services, peripherals, networking solutions, and third-party digital content and applications. The Company's products and services include iPhone®, iPad ®, Mac®, iPod®, Apple TV ®, a portfolio of consumer and professional software applications, the iOS and Mac OS ® X operating systems, iCloud®, and a variety of accessory, service and support offerings. The Company also sells and delivers digital content and applications through the iTunes Store ®, App StoreSM, iBookstoreSM, and Mac App Store. The Company sells its products worldwide through its retail stores, online stores, and direct sales force, as well as through third-party cellular network carriers, wholesalers, retailers, and value-added resellers.


Pundit  Analysis

Throughout the extraordinary surge in Apple Inc. (AAPL)’s share price, a persistent question has lingered: Why is the stock still so cheap?
Many theories have been floated for why such a rapidly expanding company with such loyal customers would trade for so little. Perhaps investors believe Apple will cling to its $97.6 billion hoard of cash and marketable securities, rather than pay a fat dividend. Others have suggested a lack of confidence about the future given the death of Steve Jobs. It’s a consumer-electronics company, after all, and competition is brutal(Bloomberg).


There is a very strong sentiment among Apple (AAPL) investors that the stock is undervalued because the P/E ratio is lower than that of other companies in the tech industry, which is understandable. In a negotiated transaction of Apple shares, a very strong case can be made that the P/E multiple should be 23, the average P/E of the S&P 500, which would value Apple at $810 per share. If the price continues to rise at the current pace of 70% in 12 months, it will be $990 by March 2013. Using trailing earnings, the P/E ratio would be about 28, which would still be reasonable given its current growth and strong balance sheet.

The problem with using P/Es for valuation purposes is that there has to be an appropriate benchmark to compare the ratio against. There is currently no company with the same performance and operational metrics as Apple to compare it against. But if we take the P/Es of other technology companies like Dell (DELL): 9, Hewlet Packard (HPQ): 9 and Microsoft (MSFT): 12, then Apple already appears to be priced at a premium (M.Makoni).

Data provided by Capital IQ, except where noted.

Valuation Measures
Market Cap (intraday)5:583.58B
Enterprise Value (Aug 7, 2012)3:555.93B
Trailing P/E (ttm, intraday):14.63
Forward P/E (fye Sep 24, 2013)1:11.85
PEG Ratio (5 yr expected)1:0.63
Price/Sales (ttm):3.92
Price/Book (mrq):5.22
Enterprise Value/Revenue (ttm)3:3.74
Enterprise Value/EBITDA (ttm)6:9.96


Financial Highlights
Fiscal Year
Fiscal Year Ends:Sep 23
Most Recent Quarter (mrq):Jun 30, 2012
Profitability
Profit Margin (ttm):26.97%
Operating Margin (ttm):35.62%
Management Effectiveness
Return on Assets (ttm):24.57%
Return on Equity (ttm):44.32%
Income Statement
Revenue (ttm):148.81B
Revenue Per Share (ttm):159.61
Qtrly Revenue Growth (yoy):22.60%
Gross Profit (ttm):43.82B
EBITDA (ttm)6:55.82B
Net Income Avl to Common (ttm):40.13B
Diluted EPS (ttm):42.55
Qtrly Earnings Growth (yoy):20.70%
Balance Sheet
Total Cash (mrq):27.65B
Total Cash Per Share (mrq):29.50
Total Debt (mrq):0.00
Total Debt/Equity (mrq):N/A
Current Ratio (mrq):1.57
Book Value Per Share (mrq):119.22
Cash Flow Statement
Operating Cash Flow (ttm):52.15B
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm):27.50B


Currently Apple's book value per share is about $110, which gives us a price to book ratio a little over 5. This is higher than Microsoft's (MSFT) 3.5, Research In Motion's (RIMM) 0.35, Nokia's (NOK) 0.75 and Google's (GOOG) 3.1. 

 Apple enjoys impressively high margins and just as great return on investment rates. Over the last 3 years, Apple's return on investment exceeds 100% and the company's annual gross margins pass 40%. At the end of the day, a company's return on investment and margins tell a story about how well a company is using its current assets and resources to generate income, and Apple is doing a wonderful job at that. The price to book value metric doesn't really take future growth into account. It assumes that the company's assets will be the same for years to come. Investing is future oriented and when we are dealing with strong growth companies like Apple, we need a metric that can actually take its future growth into account, such as forward P/E ratio. For this particular metric, Apple is doing impressively well with a forward P/E ratio well below 10 when the company's cash is added into the equation (why apples book value ratio is irrelevant).

Below is graph of Apples performance in the past 3 years.


Economeka View by Kampamba Shula


Apple is a stock I wouldn't short.Simply put Even though apple's book value may deter investing its PE ratio still looks pretty good.Given its market cap there is no way it can fail to pay its debt of which it has none significant enough to change an investment decision.

Its share price has grown by 300% since 2009.

The reason I feel Investors and the market undervalue Apple is simply because of the nature of its business.Unlike other software companies Apple concentrates on providing high end niche sort of products not like Microsoft and Dell which produce more generic software electronics.


The other main deterrent is the price.Apple trades at about $600 a share.Not many middle income people would spend that much on a stock they are not very sure about.


In conclusion I do agree that Apple has shown immense growth potential and is undoubtedly a Good Investment at least up to 2015 when the market valuation should have stabilized.


Bernanke to Economists: More Philosophy, Please


“Textbooks describe economics as the study of the allocation of scarce resources,” said Ben Bernanke on Monday morning. “That definition may be the ‘what,’ but it certainly is not the ‘why.’” He was speaking to the International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, and “why” is not a question that Federal Reserve chairmen tend to ask in front of any audience. The Fed is charged with two precise, measurable tasks: Keep unemployment low and prices stable. These are indexes, numbers on a scale, and if a Fed chairman can keep them where they should be, he can be satisfied that he has done his job. In that sense, Bernanke is playing the world’s most complex video game.
But in Monday’s speech, Bernanke wandered outside the game. He asked why he should keep prices stable and unemployment down. Those numbers mean things to humans. They mean satisfaction, the ability to live within means. They mean happiness. These kinds of words make economists uncomfortable. Happiness resists measurement. When things cannot be measured, they cannot be modeled, and if economists aren’t using models, then they aren’t scientists.
On Monday, Ben Bernanke wasn’t talking like a scientist. He was talking like a philosopher. “The ultimate purpose of economics, of course, is to understand and promote the enhancement of well-being,” he said. To a roomful of economists, he suggested that the measurements they were using, like gross domestic product and personal consumption expenditures, were inadequate to that understanding. “Aggregate statistics can sometimes mask important information,” he said. Translation: People are unhappy, and we don’t know exactly why. “We should see better and more direct measurements of economic well being,” he said, “the ultimate objective of our policy decision.” Translation: I know it’s hard to measure happiness. Start doing it, anyway.
Economeka by Kampamba Shula
If I haven't indicated on this site before I am a Big fan of Ben Bernanke.He exudes an aura of insight that is unparalleled in economics.
After reading this Bloomberg article I couldn't help but agree with the overall sentiment implied by Bernanke.
Economics is meant to improve the lives of people but the metrics used such as GDP don't fully represent the interests of society.This is the reason many people complain that the benefits of higher GDP don't trickle down to the ordinary Jim and Jack.
In short I must agree that we need better and more accurate measurements of economic well being.This calls for a revolution of economics from its academics to its application.
To do this Economics has to shift from the "what" is allocated from scarce resources but more importantly to the "why" it is allocated.This requires a paradigm shift of perception.


Friday, July 27, 2012

Stock Analysis: Real Estate Investments Zambia PLC Compiled By Kampamba Shula





Real Estate Investments Zambia PLC ("REIZ")’s (formerly Farmers House Plc)


Background
Real Estate Investments Zambia PLC (REIZ) is one of the oldest companies in Zambia, originally founded in the 1920s as a co-operative. The company was split in two during 1981, with one trading-arm remaining as a co-operative and the other taking over the business’ real estate assets, which were placed into a limited company, Farmers House Ltd. In 2006, the company listed on the Lusaka Stock Exchange, becoming Farmers House PLC...



Property Management

REIZ has interests in commercial, industrial and retail properties throughout the Zambian capital of Lusaka, with the property management including services such as security, cleaning and maintenance. Some companies choose to offer these services in-house, however REIZ stand out from the crowd by employing Southern Africa’s leading property management company, JHI/Merva to maintain its facilities...


Construction

In a similar way to the running of the property management side of the business, REIZ use third-party construction companies, in a strategy which is geared towards optimising efficiency and ensuring properties are completed on budget and to strict time constraints...

REIZ has a long  and impressive track record of property development in Zambia.
REIZ (formerly Farmers House Plc) is the only listed property development company on the Lusaka Stock Exchange.



Financial Performance Indicators

  • Gross Rental Income: ZMK 26,847 million
  • Profit from operations: ZMK 15,291 million
  • Change in fair value of Investment property, net of exchange gains: ZMK 47,212 million
  • Profit after tax: ZMK 42,518 million
  • Total Assets: ZMK 535,895 million
  • Increase in Investment properties: 63%
  • Increase in Turnover by 390% in 5 years
  • Increase in Operating Profit by 568% in 5 years
  • Total Assets Increased by 489% over 5 years



Zam-Africa Opinion

After careful consideration of the history of REIZ as Farmers house I give an unbiased view of this stock.Since 2006 to 2012 the stock has risen by 230%.This is from K1500 to K3450 as last quoted on the Lusaka stock exchange.

Price to earnings ratio
With a price to earnings ratio of 6.68...this shows there is still much room for growth in this firm as the market has not priced its shares disproportionately to its earnings.The standard PE ratio for concern is about 20 and given that this one lies way below 20 we can therefore conclude that there exists opportunity for robust growth.

Price to Book Value Ratio
With a price to book value of 0.51 .We can safely assume that REIZ is grossly undervalued.Eventually the market will set things straight at a more realistic book value, maybe even one that over values REIZ.

A key bonus for REIZ is their recent purchase of Arcades for US$25m  that has increased their estimated net asset value to beyond US$60 million.

Coupled with a strong track record and the recent aquisition My opinion is that REIZ is a stock to buy and hold for a very long time.

Thursday, June 21, 2012

Hedge Fund Bullish on Greece (OPPORTUNITIES LIE IN GREECE)



(BLOOMBERG Report)Lonely Hedge Fund Bullish on Greece Tries to Woo Investors.
In March, Elliott met with the investment chief of a family office in London who said within seconds of sitting down that the firm had no interest in giving money to a hedge fund wagering on Greece. The executive merely wanted to hear his story, Elliott, the founder of Naftilia Asset Management Ltd., said in a telephone interview from his office in Athens.
Elliott, 39, responded by asking a few questions of his own, including whether the executive had invested in Russia after its 1998 currency crisis, in Argentina 10 years ago after the nation defaulted on its debt or in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (SPX) in March 2009, when the benchmark plunged to its lowest point in 13 years. Finally, Elliott questioned whether the family office’s investment chief had ever bought shares of Apple (AAPL) Inc. In all cases, the answer was no.
“Then you are not qualified to be discussing Greece with me because you have missed the best investment opportunities over the past 20 years,” Elliott retorted.
After a lengthy discussion, the family office decided to send a team to Athens to research Elliott’s investment thesis. The firm eventually agreed to invest in Naftilia’s Greek Opportunity Fund, said Elliott, declining to identify the family office or its executives because his clients are private.

‘Feeling Optimistic’

“It takes time to convince, but when you show them the numbers and you really do not focus on the macro but the micro of individual companies, then people start to get excited,” said Elliott, who’s been raising money for the Greek fund since October. “At the same time, we are extremely lonely. We are one of the few people out there feeling optimistic.”
While Elliott declined to comment on how much money he has raised for the Greek fund, a person with direct knowledge of the matter said the total exceeds 50 million euros ($63.5 million). Elliott also won’t discuss what stocks and industries he’s researching other than saying he plans to avoid Greek banks. The total amount Elliott would consider investing won’t exceed 250 million euros because the sell-off in Greek equities has put a limit on how much money can be deployed. About 75 percent of Greek companies have a market value of less than 50 million euros, he said.
Most investors are dubious that anything tied to Greece deserves comparison with the more than 600 percent gain for Argentina’s Merval index since the end of 2001 or the growth of Apple, now the world’s most valuable company. The European country is saddled with a fifth year of recession, an unemployment rate of 21.9 percent, banks that have lost deposits and concerns about a possible exit from the 17-nation euro bloc.

Greek Elections

Following the June 17 parliamentary elections in Greece, new Prime Minister Antonis Samaras of the New Democracy party has pledged to seek relief from austerity measures that have hurt the economy while keeping European bailout funds flowing. Harvinder Sian, a senior rates strategist at Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc in London, said there’s still a 90 percent chance Greece will drop the euro within two years because of the difficulty of cutting spending and civil-service jobs.
The Athens Stock Exchange (ASE) has plunged 88 percent since the end of 2007 and the yield on 10-year Greek government bonds is 26 percent, compared with 1.6 percent for similar German bonds, indicating that investors perceive the country at high risk of default even though it restructured its debt in March.

‘Huge Uncertainty’

“There’s a huge uncertainty about the clarity and the sustainability of earnings” for Greek companies, said James Butterfill, who helps oversee about 40 billion pounds ($63 billion) as a global equity strategist at Coutts & Co. in London. “If you have a very high risk profile, then maybe you can pick out opportunities. For the majority of our clients, you would be adding a huge amount of volatility to the portfolio and that’s hard to stomach.”
The biggest danger is picking the right time to purchase stocks because of the risk that Greece can’t fulfill the financial demands required to stay in the euro, Butterfill said. Investors who move too early may find themselves holding shares they bought in euros now trading in a weaker drachma, instantly eroding much of the value, he said.
Naftilia manages about $400 million and has other hedge funds focused on trading the stocks of global shipping and nuclear energy companies. The name of the firm, which is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, derives from the Greek word for shipping.

Elliott’s Returns

Elliott’s main shipping fund, started in 2004, rose 29 percent in its first year and gained in the three following years before dropping 26 percent in 2008 and 20 percent last year, according to a person briefed on the company’s performance. Hedge funds rose 9 percent on average in 2004, fell 19 in 2008 and lost 5.3 percent in 2011, according to Chicago- based Hedge Fund Research Inc.
Elliott had been based in Dubai until deciding to open an office in his native Athens in October 2010, four months after Greece received a 110 billion-euro rescue from the European Union and the International Monetary Fund to meet its bond payments. Greece received a second bailout this year of 130 billion euros.
He did so based on a view that Greece’s debt crisis offered huge profits for investors who were willing to take the risk and that Naftilia needed an on-the-ground presence to research local companies. Elliott has spent the past 18 months examining corporate balance sheets, building a network of contacts in government and the business community, hiring analysts from banks and meeting with investors. In total, he and seven colleagues are working on the Greek Opportunity Fund.

Investment Thesis

They are focusing on companies punished by the stigma of being in Greece that generate most of their business outside the country, and firms whose share prices may make them attractive takeover targets.
“The whole premise behind the idea is that Greece has technically defaulted within a strong currency,” said Elliott, who studied money management at City University in London before starting his finance career in 1997 as an investment banker at Societe Generale SA. He also worked as a stock analyst at Marfin Investment Group SA and as an investment manager for Prometheus Gas SA, a Greek unit of Russia’s OAO Gazprom.
“When Argentina defaulted, they had incredible returns on the stock market but incredible volatility on the currency as well so it was pretty hard to start making allocations,” he said. “If Greece remains in the euro, we think this is going to be an incredible investment opportunity from a risk-return perspective.”
Conversely, the return of the drachma, which Elliott predicts won’t happen, means investors could buy stocks more cheaply.

High Yields

Piraeus Port, which has a market value of 225 million euros, has sunk 25 percent since hitting a high this year of 12.05 euros a share on Feb. 13. Thessaloniki Port, with a market capitalization of 110.6 million euros, has fallen 15 percent since also reaching a high on Feb. 13 of 12.98 euros a share. Executives at London-based Lansdowne declined to comment on their investments.
Some hedge funds have bought Greek sovereign debt because they’ve been attracted by high yields, not necessarily a bullish view on growth for the country or its companies. Finisterre Capital LLP, a London-based hedge fund, has invested in Greek government and corporate debt this year, said a person with direct knowledge of the matter, who asked not to be identified because the firm is private. Executives at the firm declined to comment.
Greylock Capital Management LLC purchased government bonds after Greece’s investors agreed to forgive 100 billion euros of debt in March, said Hans Humes, president of the New York-based hedge fund. At prices before the June 17 elections, investors could triple their money and had a downside risk of losing just 40 percent, he said. Still, it’s hard to convince hedge fund clients to invest in situations such as Greece because they fear being second-guessed, Humes said.

Investors Skeptical

“If they put money in Greece and lose money, then their bosses will say they shouldn’t have done it,” Humes said. “The reality is, that your chances of making money in a bombed out market are far higher than if you chase a market that has done very well.”
Some potential Elliott investors had been holding off until after the elections, said Stavros Siokos, a London-based president at Sciens Capital Management LLC, which provides managed accounts for those who in put money in the Naftilia Greek Opportunity Fund.
While Greece leaving the euro would be a disaster for the country and its people, an exit might benefit companies that do a lot of business overseas, he said. These companies will generate revenue in stronger currencies such as the euro and U.S. dollar, and have borrowing and labor costs in a devalued drachma, said Siokos, who was previously a Citigroup Inc. managing director in London and head of investment management at Athens-based Piraeus Bank SA.

Zam-Africa (views by kampamba shula ,Bsc Economics)
I can not help but totally agree with Mr Elliot.The chances of finding bargain buys in greece right now are at all time highs.Greece stocks will be cheaper now than they have ever been in a long time.But its about finding key companies that fit that value opportunity criteria and not just any random stocks.High yields from greece bonds attracted investors not because they believe in greece but simply because the like high returns.I highly doubt that Greece will leave the euro though conventional wisdom suggests that it should have its own currency so it can become more competitive again.Keeping Greece in the euro allows pressure for the needed structural reforms to be put in place.Given the Euro's determination to keep Greece in the euro the downside risks may be averted.
"When  blood runs on the streets tis the time to make money"

Bernanke Signals More Easing ,Weaker manufacturing numbers from china



Chairman Ben S. Bernanke is signaling the Federal Reserve will probably add to its record stimulus should the economy fail to make sufficient progress in creating jobs for 12.7 million unemployed Americans.
The policy-setting Federal Open Market Committee yesterday extended its Operation Twist program and will swap $267 billion in short-term securities with longer-term debt through the end of 2012. Fed officials also downgraded their forecasts for growth and employment while noting “significant downside risks” to the economy.
Bernanke, speaking at a Washington press conference, said policy makers are focusing “primarily” on the outlook for jobs in deciding whether to ease further, and more action would be needed without “sustained improvement in the labor market.” Payrolls grew at the slowest pace in a year in May, and the jobless rate has been stuck above 8 percent since February 2009.
“If job growth doesn’t pick up from the recent soft readings in the next few months, then the Fed would likely do more and do a full scale asset-purchase program,” said Dean Maki, chief U.S. economist at Barclays Plc in New York and a former Fed economist. “They’re prepared to take further action.”
U.S. stocks slipped after the Fed cut its estimates for growth and Bernanke said progress in the labor market has slowed. The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index fell 0.2 percent to 1,355.69 in New York. The yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note rose four basis points, or 0.04 percentage point, to 1.66 percent.

Fiscal Tightening

Bernanke said the economy is vulnerable to looming U.S. fiscal tightening and fallout from the sovereign-debt crisis in Europe. The FOMC, which has kept its benchmark interest rate near zero since December 2008, reiterated yesterday it expects to keep rates “exceptionally low” at least through late 2014.
“Additional asset purchases would be among the things that we would certainly consider if we need to take additional measures to strengthen the economy,” Bernanke said. “Our tools, while they are non-standard, still can create more accommodative financial conditions, can still provide support for the economy, can still help us to return to a more normal economic situation.”
The Fed said it will sell Treasury securities maturing in about three years or sooner and purchase a comparable amount of securities due in six years to 30 years. The central bank announced the current $400 billion maturity-extension program on Sept. 21, and it is due to expire this month.


Zam-africa (views by kampamba shula ,Bsc Economics)
My view on this matter is twofold.Firstly an effort to curb unemployment is much welcome,my only concern is why we are not noticing the inflationary pressures in the short run.China also recently introduced some QE in the market but it seems that the world economy is in a rather deflationary state (drop in asset prices).The recent drop in the oil price also indicates weaker global demand and with weaker manufacturing numbers coming from china coupled with the EU crisis,the markets may seem to perform better but the real world economy is in for slower growth possibly even contraction. 

Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Stock Analysis : Zambia Sugar PLC by Kampamba Shula

ZAMBIA SUGAR PLC.
Zambia Sugar PLC is a fully integrated sugar company that cultivates sugarcane and processes it into sugar and sugar by-products. The Company's value-added operations include the production of syrup, furfural, furfuryl alcohol, CropGuard, diacetyl, acetoin, 2.3 Pentanedione, ethyl alcohol, and lactulose. All sugar is sold under the Whitespoon brand in Zambia and overseas.




Zambia Sugar is the largest producer of sugar in Zambia.

It is reported a profit before tax at the end of 2011 of K46,831million and a profit after tax of K29,836.

An earnings per share of K4.41 and a dividend of K3.55

In Terms of being a stable investment it is very reliable for a defensive investor but if growth is what you are looking  as an enterprising investor  the prospects as analysed from its price to earnings ratio are less than optimistic.
Its Price to earnings ratio lies at 57.66 .This means its market price is about 57 times its reported earnings.This leaves low room for growth.
But in retrospect its price to book value also shows a slight opportunity for growth.Its price to book value stand at 0.85 in 2011.So assuming the market begins to accurately value its shares closer to 1 maybe there lies opportunity for value investing.

The stock records trade quite often so it may not be one for a very sensitive investor.

Take a look at the pdf summary file below.



All Values in Millions ZMK (except Per Share)FY 2011
Period End Date3/31/2011
Assets
+ Cash & Near Cash Items53,791.00
+ Short-Term Investments0.00
+ Accounts & Notes Receivable64,206.00
+ Inventories102,534.00
+ Other Current Assets344,603.00
Total Current Assets565,134.00
+ LT Investments & LT Receivables0.00
+ Net Fixed Assets1,264,658.00
+ Other Long-Term Assets272,515.00
Total Long-Term Assets1,537,173.00
Total Assets2,102,307.00
Liabilities & Shareholders' Equity
+ Accounts Payable94,811.00
+ Short-Term Borrowings371,356.00
+ Other Short-Term Liabilities86,835.00
Total Current Liabilities553,002.00
+ Long-Term Borrowings779,216.00
+ Other Long-Term Liabilities35,701.00
Total Long-Term Liabilities814,917.00
Total Liabilities1,367,919.00
+ Total Preferred Equity0.00
+ Minority Interest28,558.00
+ Share Capital & APIC247,337.00
+ Retained Earnings & Other Equity458,493.00
Total Equity734,388.00
Total Liabilities & Equity2,102,307.00
 

Friday, June 1, 2012

Invest trust Bank Zambia:The share price review By Kampamba Shula



Who is Invest Trust Bank?

BACKGROUND Investrust Bank plc is a registered commercial bank in Zambia and has been in existence since 19 September 1996. The shareholders and directors of the Bank are seasoned bankers with proven track records at the highest levels.

INVESTRUST BANK PLC - BOARD OF DIRECTORS


Dr. Justin B. Zulu
Chairman
First Zambian Governor, Bank of Zambia and former Executive Director at International Monetary Fund.
Mr Friday C. Ndhlovu
Managing Director

Former Managing Director of Zambia National Commercial Bank.
Mr Reuben L. Bvulani
Director

Former General Manager at the Bank of Zambia.
Mrs. Eva Jhala
Director

Lawyer and former Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Legal Affairs.
Mr. Newton Lungu
Director

Chartered Accountant and Managing Partner, Newton Lungu & Associates.

Invest Trust Stock Price Analysis BY Kampamba Shula


Invest Trust Bank trades today at K17 but usually around K20.

It has no price to earnings ratio recorded but has an abnormal price to book value ratio of 1433.79.

But given their earnings per share to be K1.23,we can calculate their PE Ratio given the market price.
This gives us a PE ratio of 13.82,which is quite good.
But their book value ratio leaves much to desired.
In simple terms this means their ordinary shares are overpriced by that ratio to their actual Book Value.My question is that is the market right in overvaluing their shares,possibly expecting greater earnings in Future or is this an accounting error...take a look for your self at the price to book value ratio of Investtrust in the pdf file below.

LUSE MARKET REPORT